Notifications
Clear all

Backtested: Is RSI + EMA a Reliable Combo in Current Market Conditions?

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
22 Views
(@hodlmasterx)
Active Member
Joined: 1 month ago
Posts: 5
Topic starter  

I recently ran a backtest on a simple RSI(14) + EMA(50) crossover strategy across 15 mid-cap altcoins over the last 6 months. Results were... mixed. On higher timeframes (4H+), the combo outperformed hodling in about 40% of the cases, but whipsaws killed the edge on lower timeframes.

My question:

Has anyone had consistent success using RSI in trending vs. ranging markets in 2024–2025 conditions?

I’m wondering if it’s worth optimizing these indicators per asset, or if we should move on to volume-based systems and order book signals. Would love to hear from any traders with real performance data or who’ve built bots using these setups.


   
Quote
(@whale-tracker01)
Active Member
Joined: 3 weeks ago
Posts: 6
 

Great question — and I totally relate to the frustration with whipsaws lately.

I’ve been testing RSI-based strategies pretty actively this year, and here’s what I’ve found in 2024–2025 conditions:

🔄 Trending vs. Ranging Markets:

  • RSI (especially 14) still works okay in strong trending markets if you combine it with a volatility or momentum filter (like ADX or Bollinger Band width). But yeah, in chop or sideways consolidation, it becomes close to useless — tons of false signals.

  • On ranging pairs (like some mid-cap alts during the sideways phases earlier this year), shorter RSI windows (e.g., RSI 7 or even 5) combined with horizontal support/resistance zones seemed to reduce noise a bit.

📊 Optimization Per Asset:

  • 100% yes — mid-caps behave very differently from majors like ETH or BTC. I’ve had better results optimizing RSI thresholds (not just period length) per asset. For instance, setting overbought/oversold zones to 60/40 or even 55/45 depending on volatility profile worked better than the classic 70/30.

📈 Volume-Based Systems:

  • I’ve been shifting more toward volume-weighted indicators (e.g., VWAP, OBV divergence) and real-time order book depth imbalances — especially useful on shorter timeframes like 15m or 30m. They react faster and seem more aligned with how bots and whales are moving in 2025’s more fragmented liquidity environment.

🤖 Bot/Algo Notes:

  • If you’re building bots, try pairing RSI + EMA with a volume spike confirmation or a cooldown filter (i.e., “don’t enter a trade if the last X candles already moved Y%”). This drastically cut down on FOMO entries for me.

  • Also consider RSI divergence + volume confirmation instead of crossovers — fewer signals, but cleaner setups.

Would love to hear if anyone’s cracked a hybrid model here — I’m still tuning mine for better downside protection. This market feels like it demands more adaptive systems than ever.


   
ReplyQuote
Share: